These 10 core competencies comprise good leadership
Visonary
Good leaders create a vision, a picture of the future, of where they want to take their organizations. Leaders can improve both the quality and acceptance of the vision by partnering with their peers, executive team, key employees throughout the organization or outside consultants. To get the best vision you need lots of ideas, and people support what they help to create.
Inspirational.
Once a vision is established, great leaders can inspire everyone in the company to get onboard. Employees in great organizations are passionate about what they do. This inspiration extends to customers, investors, suppliers, boards of directors and all other stakeholders.
This doesn't mean good leaders have to be charismatic or great public speakers, though some are. Leaders may inspire by example or in low-key ways. Every word and action demonstrates their passion for the vision.
Strategic.
Strategic leaders are clear and directly face the strengths and weaknesses of their own organizations, as well as their external opportunities and threats. They think in terms of leverage, fishing where the big fish are and partnering to gain market advantage. While interested in one sale, they would rather create pipelines and strategic alliances that generate thousands, or hundreds of thousands, of sales.
Tactical.
Wired like businesspeople, good leaders are bottom-line oriented and extraordinarily committed to results. They thrive on facts, figures, numbers and data. They're interested in ROI, ROE and EBIDTA. If not numbers-oriented themselves, they surround themselves with strong financial talent.
Focused.
Once vision and mission (a brief, clear statement of the reasons for an organization's existence) are established, good leaders achieve what they set out to do before launching new initiatives. By contrast, poor leaders may have dozens of conflicting programs and priorities. Leaders with 20 priorities essentially have no priorities.
Persuasive.
Not necessarily salespeople, good leaders can bring others to their point of view using logic, reason, emotion and the force of their personalities. They motivate by persuasion rather than intimidation. The key here is the leader speaking from his or her heart.
Likeable.
Good leaders are people-centric. They may be scientists, engineers or technical experts by background, but they recognize interpersonal skills are paramount. They display high degrees of emotional intelligence, and thrive on finesse and likeability.
They want to be liked -- and they are. Again, the key is what's inside the leader. Likeability comes from the inside out.
Decisive.
Sometimes shooting from the hip, good leaders can make decisions quickly -- often with incomplete data. As Theodore Roosevelt said, "In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing."
Rarely is a leader able to get 100 percent of the information needed for a decision. Typically it is "60 percent and go" or "80 percent and go."
Ethical.
Good leaders are direct and straightforward. They set clear performance expectations and hold people accountable. This requires being direct and truthful, which can be difficult but -- more often than not -- is natural for the principle-based leader. Good leaders know it's hard to beat the truth.
Open to feedback.
Good leaders are open and dedicated to lifelong learning. They seek feedback about their performance through direct conversations and objective tools such as 360-degree reviews. Seeking continuous improvement in their companies, they also seek it for themselves.
The direct link to the complete article by William S.
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This article has some good points when it comes to teachers being leaders - like being visionary, inspirational, and ethical. I especially like the idea of the teacher being open to feedback and being a lifelong learner, which is what I think is the most important strength that a teacher can have.
ReplyDeleteHowever, this list does have a few things that I disagree with if we are talking about teachers. The tactical point notes that leaders are bottom-line driven and committed to results. If teachers were to act like this, I think that they wouldn't care what or how they taught, so long as students were prepared for the test. This is the wrong way to teach in my opinion, and teaching to a test does not educate your students.
The other point I didn't like was the presuasive one. I don't think that it is a teachers job to presuade students to think like them or to get students to agree with their opinions. Teachers need to create an open and nurturing environment where everybody's opinions matter.
fair enough. good points
ReplyDeleteThanks for pointing that out Connor. In philosophy we've been talking a bit about this idea of persuasion as opposed to teaching with authority. I think the idea this article is actually speaking to under the subtitle "persuasive," is actually "charismatic."
ReplyDeletePersuasion assumes that the teacher must negotiate in order to achieve validity in the eyes of the students. Students and teachers battle for power over what the teacher has identified to be the facts. How academically unproductive is that?
Conversely, if the teacher is seen as an authority on the subject, opposition to the concepts presented by the teacher is met with interest and respect. The classroom is a safe environment. Oppositional ideas aren't reflective of a struggle for power, but rather a welcome intellectual debate.
Charisma, on the other hand, is one way of achieving authority. It works mainly by capturing the imaginations of your audience, and making them want to work for you... If you need to persuade them, you aren't charismatic.